![]() Soleymani offers another reason to steer clear of boxers, especially if you’re an active guy: “Boxers can be bad, especially for sports, because of friction leading to chafing. “Leg ride-up is the number-one complaint among boxer brief wearers,” according to the underpants producer. On the other hand, boxer briefs can be uncomfortable, according to consumer research conducted by OG underwear brand Fruit of the Loom, which, you know, seems like an objective source that we should definitely trust. They seem more grown-up than briefs, plus I can steal them and wear them as running shorts in a pinch.) (Another pro, from my POV: boxers are sexy. On the one hand, Soleymani told us that boxers protect a delicate area from zipper accidents. Soleymani, who could put things in the context of your skin down there. ![]() “There’s no difference.”Ĭould it really be that simple? Skeptical, I decided to follow Werthman’s advice and get a second opinion, from Dr. ![]() “It boils down to this: do whatever’s comfortable,” he says. So in Werthman’s opinion, is the best option boxers, briefs, or commando? “Studies have been done to analyze temperatures of men who wear boxers versus briefs, and it makes absolutely no difference in fertility.” That’s why people get multiple opinions,” Werthman says. “I’ve heard urologists say all kind of wacky crap just because they’re ignorant. “It’s an old wives’ tale.” He’s not sure how the myth - that snug briefs keep balls too close to the body’s warmth, raising their temperature and cooking the 400 million sperm within like crabs at a seafood boil - got its start, but it’s one Werthman has heard again and again over his 20 years as a urologist.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |